Insights › Market reaction

IBM preliminary Q2 miss: shares fell 6.08% in 10 minutes, 13.20% by 53 minutes

Published in ET: Feed time in ET: Company Corporate IBM -14.43% (10m)
IBM Adj. EPS 2.27 (exp. 3.02), Revenue 17.2bln (exp. 17.9bln), Non-GAAP gross profit margin 59.4%, -0.7% (IBM
MoveSurge publish 07:00:19 ET
MoveSurge publish
07:00:19 ET
285.12 268.42 251.21 234.51 239.90 06:56 07:00 07:15
Real 1-minute OHLC candles around publish time. Chart times are New York ET; source: MT5/IBKR market data captured by MoveSurge.

Reaction by asset (real prices)

Asset2m beforeAt release+1m+10m+1m %+10m %Vol vs normal
IBM 281.40 256.39 257.00 240.80 -8.67% -14.43% 105.3× normal

IBM's preliminary second-quarter figures crossed at 7:00:19 a.m. ET on July 14, 2026. IBM was 256.39 at the release timestamp, 240.80 ten minutes later, down 6.081%, and 222.54 by 7:53 a.m. ET, down 13.203% from release. The larger 14.428% figure measures from the 281.40 print two minutes before the headline, not from the release price.

IBM issued selected preliminary results, not final Q2 numbers

IBM described the figures as selected preliminary results and said its final second-quarter numbers could differ slightly. In its July 14, 2026 letter to investors, the company reported revenue of $17.2 billion, GAAP diluted earnings of $2.27 per share and operating non-GAAP earnings of $2.93 per share. Operating gross margin was 59.4%, down 70 basis points.

That distinction corrects an important problem in the initial headline: $2.27 was GAAP diluted earnings per share, not adjusted earnings. Reuters reported on July 14, 2026 that analysts had expected $17.86 billion of revenue and $3.02 of adjusted earnings per share. The comparable preliminary operating figure was $2.93.

The first-minute read depends on the starting print

IBM printed 281.40 two minutes before the event timestamp, 256.39 at release and 257.00 one minute afterward. The recorded 8.671% first-minute decline is therefore the change from 281.40 to 257.00 across that three-minute sequence. It is not an 8.671% decline from the release price during the first post-release minute.

The release-aligned path was different. IBM was marginally above its 256.39 release price at the first post-release minute, then fell to 240.80 at ten minutes and 239.90 at fifteen minutes. Those later prices represented declines of 6.081% and 6.432%, respectively, from the release timestamp.

The decline deepened within the available intrahour window

The ten- and fifteen-minute observations show little additional deterioration between those two points. The next available price, however, was 222.54 at 7:53 a.m. ET, 13.203% below the release price. The available sequence therefore shows an initial post-release pause, a sharp leg lower by ten minutes and renewed downside before the end of the first hour.

Verified observations are not available at the standardized 30-minute, 60-minute, two-hour, four-hour or six-hour marks. The evidence supports the intrahour path through 53 minutes but does not establish whether the decline subsequently persisted, reversed or stabilized.

IBM pointed to spending shifts and missed execution

IBM reported that Software revenue rose 5%, Consulting revenue was flat and Infrastructure revenue fell 7%. The company said it had previously expected Infrastructure revenue to begin declining at a low-single-digit rate, but its Z mainframe performance and associated transaction-processing software were weaker than anticipated.

Management attributed much of the shortfall to customers redirecting quarterly capital spending toward servers, storage and memory as they sought supply-constrained equipment before expected price increases. IBM also said numerous large deals did not close on the anticipated timetable. The defensible narrative update is therefore a combination of enterprise technology-budget reprioritization and company execution, rather than a broader conclusion about AI investment returns.

No synchronized peer confirmation

Reuters reported on July 14 that other software stocks also fell, providing later evidence of wider sector pressure. No synchronized peer prices accompanied the IBM reaction, however, so the timing, breadth and relative magnitude of that sector move cannot be measured from the supplied market data. The evidence establishes a severe IBM reaction; it does not by itself separate company-specific damage from a broader software repricing.

See it live, the moment it happens

MoveSurge surfaces market-moving headlines in seconds and attaches the real price reaction — so you read the move while it still matters.

Start Pro Start free View IBM in the live feed See pricing